Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +123%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
60
4096
Shading Units
3840
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 21
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy