CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
VS
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
AMD Radeon Pro W6800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800
+123%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
VS
Radeon Pro W6800
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
60
4096
Shading Units
3840
256
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 21
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
2
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon X550 XTX
3
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
4
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
5
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI FirePro V4900
6
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 285
7
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
8
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570
9
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
10
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy