Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +381%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy