Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 350X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +890%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350X OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Oland
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy