AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
+205%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560
2.611 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.4
