Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 +953%
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GT200B
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy