Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 270 vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R9 270 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 +3600%
2.368 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
RV620
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy