Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 32GB VRAM AMD Radeon Pro V420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V420 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon Pro V420 +2578%
13.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
819.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
4096
20
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
435.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.85 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.963 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Vega 20
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy