Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
16496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +11838%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
400
Shading Units
16896
20
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GB100
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
208 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy