ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
+1525%
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
43W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
RV620
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
