Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro S7150

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +624%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tonga
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy