Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V7770

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V7770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 76W)
ATI FirePro V7770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (33.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V7770 +92%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
33.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
800
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
76W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV770
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy