Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W5000

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 +143%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy