Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +668%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Tahiti
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy