Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3470 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (15.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +712%
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3470
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV620
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy