Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 320GB)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 143W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +128%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
320MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
400
Shading Units
96
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
143W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
G80
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy