Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1375%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2560
20
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 10
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy