Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +2982%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
3840
20
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 21
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy