Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 70W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +2244%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 33
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy