Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +983%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2816
20
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
580W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Hawaii
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy