Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380X +664%
3.973 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1425 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
182.4GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.973 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.973 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
248.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Antigua
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy