Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V4800

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +19%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
400
20
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Redwood
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy