Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT +745%
4.394 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy