Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 53W)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6400 +585%
3.565 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1923 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.130 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.565 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
53W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 24
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy