Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A380

ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Arc A380 +707%
4.198 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
DG2-128
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy