Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV530
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy