Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
5744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5040%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
400
Shading Units
6144
20
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
AD104
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy