Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V5800

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 74W)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 +76%
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
74W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Juniper
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy