Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W2100

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +43%
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Oland
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy