Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 +7710%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
480
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
320W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD103
Turks GL
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy