Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W9100

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +739%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Hawaii
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy