Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +1318%
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
480
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT218S
Turks GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy