Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 68W)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
NVS 810 +69%
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GM107
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy