Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +225%
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV630
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy