Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D +237%
2.106 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy