Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7300X +817%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy