Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +435%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Tahiti
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy