Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV530
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy