Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1823%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
480
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD107
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy