Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireGL V3600

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800 +330%
0.62 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
3
400
Shading Units
120
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV630
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy