Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 69W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV380
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy