Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 240W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800 +30%
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
4
400
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
R600
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
240W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy