Home GPU Comparison Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs ATI FirePro V4800

Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4400 and a Desktop platform GPU: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 4400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Lower TDP (20W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 4400
0.304 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +103%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
FirePro
Integrated
Type
Desktop
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

200 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
1024MB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
160
Shading Units
400
20
TMUs
20
2
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
19.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
304.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Haswell GT2
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Generation 7.5
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
Unknown
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
69W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy