Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800 +545%
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4350
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
1
400
Shading Units
80
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV710
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy