Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI FireGL V3600

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +433%
0.768 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV630
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy