Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD FirePro S9150

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +560%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Hawaii
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy