Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI FirePro V8700

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 +56%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
10
480
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV770
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy