Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD FireStream 9370

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +243%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1600
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cypress
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy