Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 84W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +190%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
480
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
84W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
G92
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy