Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +198%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
480
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT215
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy