Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +357%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Feb 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
825 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
13.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
480
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.748 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.992 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
167.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GF119
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy